Reality Waveform Theory (RWT) purely logically describes the basics of reality (including the sole base pattern of reality), so constitutes the genuine theory of everything, nothing, and the basics of something.
The grounded and unspun logic of RWT comes from a pure exercise (albeit from an odd angle) of the scientific method.
In other words, RWT is authored for scientists and science enthusiasts, so strictly conforms to the scientific method — i.e. no pseudo/junk science, and not philosophical, despite any appearance to the contrary.
The fact is literally no experimental science conflicts with RWT.
Scientists probably see the word “Spirit” in the name of this journal as a red flag, so promptly injecting a fully logical definition of spirit is sensible. This theory includes reality being pure energy, at least based upon the fullest application of mainstream physics during this authoring. Logically speaking, a spirit is an energy signature modulating in a way prompting some sense of familiarity, but extends beyond full conscious grasp.
Stunned to learn that any complex sonic result is completely formed by combinations of simplistic sine waves, this Berklee College of Music graduate with a degree in music synthesis hypothesized that a sine wave is a microcosm of an equally simple pattern solely needed to form any aspect of reality.
After almost two decades of educational exposure to scientific documentaries — as publicly taught by Dr. Brian Cox, Dr. Brian Greene, Dr. Stephen Hawking, Dr. Michio Kaku, Dr. Carl Sagan, Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson, and many other brilliant individuals within those scientific circles — all scientific signs (and sines) point to the sine wave actually being the sole base pattern of reality.
To secure public interest in science, a group of scientists leverage the strong power of entertainment. In response, this entertainer (and obviously part of that public) is combining their scientific results with the remaining logic necessary to help society secure the genuine theory of everything that has been strongly pursued for generations.
For clarity, it helps to first list the logical parts constituting RWT. To provide a better sense with regards to how this theory came to be, that list is separated into two main categories; one is commonly expressed conclusions in well-established scientific documentaries, and the other contains purely logical constructs basically uncommonly expressed.
Prominent Scientific Documentary Conclusions
1. Pure Energy
The equation E=mc² reveals that although mass and energy can be used distinctly for the sake of utility, they are ultimately the same (mass-energy equivalence).
Moreover, quantum field theory states that subatomic particles are fields of energy.
Moreover still, string theory states that subatomic particles are modulating strings of energy.
In short, there is no scientific conclusion that even suggests that any aspect of humanly known reality is fundamentally anything but pure energy.
2. Wave-Particle Duality
Wave-particle duality in quantum physics states that particles act as waves.
3. Time is Spatial
Time is an experimentally proven dimension of space.
4. No Realized Linearity
No purely straight line objectively exists.
Everything is curvy — or wavy, when necessarily considering that energy never settles, at least from humanity’s perspective (e.g. all proclaimed settled objects on Earth are flying around the sun).
To clarify by example, even if one draws a straight line on a computer display, zooming far enough into the pixels displaying that line eventually shows only bumpy curvature.
Other Completely Logical Constructs
1. Sine Wave
Each complex sound (i.e. any sound more complex than a single sine wave) consists solely of sine waves.
There is a fundamental sine wave that usually establishes the dominant pitch of a complex sound via amplitude dominance, and one or more overtones (each a sine wave).
Varying the number of overtones, and/or frequency and/or amplitude of any of them, changes the sound.
Importantly note that a sine wave can additionally modulate frequency, amplitude, and the number of overtones — i.e. a sine wave can modulate another sine wave’s properties, and can also modulate the number of existing sine waves.
No scientific reason prevents that sinusoidal purity from existing within literally any form of energy (so not just sound).
2. No Objective Boundary
All known beings draw boundaries for leverage.
That drawing is necessary, because survival (e.g. identifying food, and so on) as a being within reality is impossible otherwise. Scientists inclusively have to form boundaries, because scientific leverage would also be impossible otherwise.
However, scrutiny at the quantum level reveals that no objective boundary exists.
Any boundary is purely subjective (even if agreeable by all honest human beings), based upon quantum physics — which describes the subatomic particle realm as a quantum foam, where particles are blurry/cloudy, and particles of the same type are identical.
Only the physicality of the brain that generates those boundaries objectively exists, and that physicality is pure energy.
3. Total Physicality
There is no scientific evidence that proves any aspect of reality, including the overwhelming majority of it beyond human perception (at times categorized as mental or spiritual) is anything but physical.
4. Indestructible Reality
Energy cannot be destroyed, according to a law of physics.
Moreover, as time is a spatial dimension, all moments (past, present, and future) exist simultaneously as one spatial moment — this one. So experiencing reality (e.g. reading this) logically means that reality cannot be destroyed in any future place, because destroying reality in the future negates experiencing reality now.
5. Balance
Literally every system requires balance for stability.
Due to the modulating nature of reality (i.e. modulation includes a balancing act between the negative and positive peaks of a stable waveform), the law of physics stating that every action is an opposite and equal reaction, and the absence of any science even suggesting the possibility that any system can be unbalanced yet stable, the scientific conclusion is reality (i.e. the system of all systems) also requires balance for stability.
Assembling the Parts
Reality is an unimaginably complex waveform of energy from humanity’s perspective.
That ending phrase warrants an aside about observation. There is the objective truth, which is valid from any perspective (i.e. the absence of perspective). There is also a scientific sub-class of subjectivity called human subjectivity (or hubjectivity) equal to humanity’s purely rationalized perspective — i.e. no human being can honestly rationalize a result differently. Hubjectivity necessarily strictly conforms to the scientific method, so is a valid form of scientific observation. Hubjectivity basically forms almost all scientific conclusions to date, as scientists can only acknowledge the logical possibility that actuality deviates from that humanly rationalized perspective (i.e. humanity is unavoidably a part of any scientific experiment ultimately).
As no reason exists to believe that energy waveforms are not solely comprised of sine waves, the sole base pattern of the reality waveform is the sine wave — e.g. a galaxy, or any relatively huge such, and any subatomic particle “meet” at the sine wave. This is where Quantum Physics and Relativity logically fit together.
Logic concludes that each half of a sine wave cycle is identical with the only difference being positive or negative pressure — importantly noting positive and negative are relative, as confirmed simply by turning the waveform or the observer upside down — so one can scientifically argue that semi-sinusoidal pressure is the sole base pattern of reality.
However, this theory works with the full sine wave cycle as the sole base pattern simply for communication and illustrative purposes — i.e. avoiding having to constantly say semi-sinusoidal pressure[s] or coin a new term, and illustrating that a sine wave cycle is readily informative in terms of understanding the key basic elements of that pattern. Those elements are negative dominance, positive dominance, and balance dominance — altogether forming the most basic, harmonious tripolar “superbalance” that every system needs for sustainment.
Balance is inherent within stability, because balance (i.e. the point of zero amplitude) is more frequent than each of the negative and positive peaks in the sine wave.
Due to the seamless nature of energy, there is no objective boundary separating any individual (living or not). Boundaries are purely subjective. Any hard-line separation used solely for communication purposes herein must be taken with consideration of the hubjectivity of that separation.
Due to the absence of any objective boundary, there is only one reality (the reality sine wave). As relativity requires something relative to something else, there is no relativity at the scale of reality’s oneness.
As relativity is required for definition (explicitly defining what something is relative to implicitly what that something is not), the reality sine wave has no definition (no shape, no central point, and so on).
As there is no objective boundary within a reality of pure energy, anything is energy.
As everything is physical, all information is physical, so all information modulates as energy too. That includes any property/action modulating in all possible ways, as a seamless part of the reality sine wave. For example, the language within thoughts (including intentions, decisions, hopes, and so on) is a seamless part of the reality sine wave.
An unimaginable number of sine waves exist from humanity’s perspective — that perspective (or similar one) required for any application of plurality (i.e. there is no objective plurality).
Each sine wave is an energy current with combinations of them sometimes forming larger energy currents (including self-similarity).
Dissonance from competing energy currents (e.g. hot air meeting cold air) result in more chaotic currents (more dissonance equals more chaos), while harmony from non-competing energy currents provides the opposite. As dissonance and harmony are both completely constructed of sine waves, dissonance and harmony are subjective (e.g. a popularly harmonious music style that sounds dissonant due to cultural unfamiliarity).
Note that two opposing currents stacked atop each other are not separated by a hard-line. Analyzing perpendicularly to those currents, one witnesses a gradual decrease in flow strength from one current to a gradual increase in flow strength in the opposite direction — i.e. one witnesses another sine wave or a more complex waveform capable of being reduced to a pure set of sine waves.
The notion of reality’s creation (i.e. initial waveform generation) is senseless. To clarify, one can ask, “What existed before existence?”, or “What exists outside of existence?”, which is similar to asking, “What is north of the North Pole?” — all nonsensical questions.
Creation and destruction are actions forming subjectively dominating positive and negative modulations of energy.
Due to the seamless nature of reality, the multiverse is more accurately called the universe (which is synonymous with reality), while the known aspect of the universe is sensibly called the knownverse.
Although the knownverse does not have a steady state (as once proposed until sufficient evidence supported an alternative expanding form), the universe does have a steady state.
Experience itself proves that reality is permanently stable. In other words, if reality (the totality of existence) is terminated within reality at any point in space (including time), then experiencing reality (e.g. reading these words) becomes impossible.
That conclusion is reinforced by the corresponding law of physics stating that energy cannot be destroyed. Only the energy type can be changed in conformance with the modulating needs of the reality sine wave (e.g. from potential to kinetic energy).
The human brain forms the illusion of motion, but as time is a spatial dimension, all events actually occur simultaneously (there is no actual motion), so reality is only one moment — this one.
That includes an inconceivably enormous amount of seamless future energy constructs physically rippling towards (actually curved towards without motion) and seamlessly affecting the present and past, relatively speaking.
As space is energy, all spatial possibilities curve/ripple energy in all possible ways to form the spatial present, seamlessly from humanity’s perspective (including the dominant resonance of space-time).
Sustained rigidity is a form of linearity (i.e. sustaining rigidity over time is linear). There is no objective linearity, so no objective rigidity.
As dimensionality is energy, the number of dimensions modulates in all possible ways, so common dimensional possibilities are not linear — i.e. there can be no fixed and limited number of dimensions within a boundless reality. The number of identifiable dimensions is contingent upon context.
Forces of energy occur at any scale, and scale itself modulates. Such energy outcomes (resonating and interfering to create dominating energy waves) are applied towards the energy constructs called brains to form decisions within an energy flow conforming to that domination. Freewill equals reality.
Importantly note that no objective boundary means that there is no actual boundary between the four fundamental forces (gravity, electromagnetism, strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force) scientifically accepted as the only known forces during this authoring.
While individuals draw boundaries for utility as an ironic part of the flow of energy, those boundaries only exist in whatever subjectively defined energy construct (e.g. brain, computer, and so on) expressing that existence.
A single cycle of a sine wave demonstrates the law of physics stating that every action is an opposite and equal reaction. As time is spatial, causality does not actually exist (which, by the way, is why the laws of physics work regardless of the direction of the arrow of time), so there is no causality violation against that law in this case. Moreover, that law requires multiple objects (e.g. a person pushes a wall that simultaneously “pushes” back), so seems to be violated by the single sine wave cycle being only one object. However, there is no objective boundary between objects (i.e. multiple is subjective), so no such violation occurs in this case.
Nothing must become something within any expression, because mentally working towards an expressible conclusion requires mental grasping, and applying that grasp to genuinely nothing is logically impossible. In other words, any effect from mentally working with supposedly nothing undeniably renders that supposed nothing as something. Everything is equal in that regard (i.e. mentally grasping supposedly everything renders that supposed everything as merely something), because one cannot be outside of everything to grasp it.
The utility from not-quite-accurately representing nothing and everything are relative directions towards those perceived destinations. To clarify, if one party travels towards everything (the largest scope of the reality sine wave) and another party travels towards nothing (the tiniest scope of the reality sine wave), they will logically meet upon arrival at their destination – the present (because reality has no objective size, nor central point, and time is a spatial dimension). In other words, nothing and everything are objectively the same undefinable extreme.
No resonance within reality logically equals reality (everything) “resonates”, so logically no resonance (nothing).
That last conclusion confuses anyone who draws a mental boundary to separate their individuality from the rest of reality, while actively mentally trying to understand reality. As part of the reality sine wave, their focus causes a resonance conflicting with everything/nothing “resonating”. To understand that conclusion, one must successfully conduct the No Boundaries experiment (which is documented below) to maximally experience the reality sine wave “resonance”.
The seamless boundary between subjectivity and objectivity itself modulates, and when it modulates towards subjectivity (e.g. an observation), an energy signature as defined by that subjectivity is an experience by a being within reality.
The tiniest modulating pressure towards subjectivity starts a resonance within reality. The stronger the focus/subjectivity (i.e. the more amplified the subjectivity), obviously the stronger the resonance.
Completely mentally grasping reality is the extreme of subjectivity amplification, but because reality is boundless, and infinite amplitude is impossible without breaking a waveform (e.g. the reality sine wave), modulation ultimately in the name of reality’s supreme balance must interfere.
Working to completely understand reality always ultimately fails, because subjectivity amplification inevitably increases the objectivity-versus-subjectivity tension to the point of futility against that worker (like mass trying to travel at the speed of light), and the necessary consequent release contributes to reality’s stability (i.e. the reality sine wave wins any conflict).
The ‘standing wave end points’ of the reality sine wave are everything and nothing (i.e. the same undefinable extreme), but a human being perceives that undefinable extreme as a complexly modulating ocean of energy, because each human being is a seamless part of the reality sine wave, so a seamless part of that undefinable extreme — i.e. perception is the energy effect from a set of limits due to subjectivity amplification.
In other words, reality equals all seamless possibilities, and that necessarily includes the supreme balance of all possibilities for reality’s demonstrable stability. Balancing phase inversion must be a part of that balance, but it is a special balance that ends relativity, because it results in supreme phase cancellation (a.k.a. destructive interference in physics), which results fittingly in reality objectively being an undefinable extreme.
The verbal expression of the most fundamental equation is ‘a balanced reality of pure energy = all seamless possibilities mirrored internally by phase inversion’, which gives us the simplified equation ‘everything = nothing’.
Importantly repeated for emphasis that a possibility is limited in that it cannot defy reality’s balance, so the set of seamless possibilities within reality is limited. In short, reality’s balance is the only “boundary”.
Sine waves are expressible mathematically (e.g. trigonometry), so the math of this theory comes in the form of complete sinusoidal application (wavy mathematics).
However, sinusoidal shaping (e.g. factoring in oceanic dimensionality) is more complex than current mathematical availability during this authorship, so an improvement of mathematical sinusoidal application is needed in the name of improving our understanding of sinusoidal shaping.
Since rigidity is only an illusion caused by curves lengthy (or tiny) enough to be perceived as perfectly smooth (e.g. the Earth was once wrongfully considered flat), rigid mathematical constructs (i.e. complex informational waveforms seamlessly part of the reality sine wave) are problematic due to that rigidity, and inevitably lead to the aforementioned tension caused by subjectivity amplification — where that rigidity conflicts with further pursuing understanding beyond that rigidity (e.g. at the point where mathematical application breaks into a misfitting infinity).
As mathematical constructs are always relatively complex informational waveforms seamlessly modulating within the reality sine wave, the formula of this theory is properly expressed as a sine wave cycle, so not a mathematical equation.
Computer simulations solely relying upon sine wave combinations (called additive synthesis) within controlled environments — with experimental validation possible by sufficiently matching the results of those simulations with actual changes in energy outside of those simulations — better teaches how reality works within (or relative to) the human vicinity.
The only limit occurs when additive synthesis itself conflicts with the reality sine wave in the form of the aforementioned tension and release from subjectivity amplification.
That is when the No Boundaries experiment (i.e. the epitome of that release) completes understanding.
No Boundaries Experiment
Since you are the sole subject of this experiment, this explanation is conveniently directed towards you.
As boundaries separating objects do not objectively exist, the boundary separating you from everybody and everything else is subjective.
You may conduct this experiment to best experience the supremely powerful oneness of that conclusion, but only if reality permits. The ability to perform this experiment requires you to temporarily rest your brain to avoid subjectivity amplification, which is not always allowable by reality.
As balance is basically synonymous with stability (and stability is necessary for survival), a healthy work ethic must be balanced with a healthy rest ethic. If you choose to conduct this experiment, then you must find a safe place in tune with the latter ethic.
This experiment requires accomplishing three steps with a challenge factor contingent upon your situation (e.g. workaholics find this experiment too challenging until optimal brain rest occurs for them).
Critically understand that you are not forcing your brain to accomplish these steps — which could (if not does) cause mental injury — but allowing your brain to rest into the maximum (not always complete) experience of that accomplishment.
Step One
Rest the part of your brain that mentally processes the future.
When you complete this step, you experience no sense of the future.
Step Two
Rest the part of your brain that mentally processes the past.
When you complete this step, you experience no sense of the future and past, so just experience the continuous “live feed” that is the present.
Step Three
Rest the part of your brain that draws boundaries within the present, which includes the boundary separating you from the rest of reality.
You experience the completion of this step, when the words “I”, “you”, and “we” (and literally everyone and everything else) effortlessly becomes synonymous.
In other words, you rest into becoming maximally one with the reality sine wave.
Otherwise, you feel some lesser degree of resonance towards that supremely powerful oneness. Do not feel negative about that, because reality cannot allow everyone to always abandon subjective boundaries to resonate as one with reality, as that would obviously end reality’s unending balance.
Trying to grasp that oneness (i.e. drawing a boundary) ends that oneness sensation.
You do not need to conduct steps one and two, if you can simply successfully achieve step three, because the first two steps are inherent within step three. The first two steps simply serve to facilitate the achieving of step three.
Experiment Conclusion
Feeling the reality sine wave resonance is logically complete peace, because literally no other being exists for possible conflict.
That oneness resonance makes perfect sense, because the absence of resonance within reality (i.e. no subjectivity amplification) equals reality itself resonating (i.e. all/no resonance).
Overall Conclusion
Through many generations of meeting challenges, the scientific community has provided the bulk of the information that forms RWT.
Upon a similar meeting, society provided the environment sufficiently proper to exercise that science.
Nature fundamentally shaped (and continues to shape) society.
Reality inclusively shapes nature, if one insists upon defining nature as distinct from humanity’s results, even though both nature and those results are purely and seamlessly energy. Otherwise, nature (including humanity and technology) is another of the many synonyms for reality (actuality, cosmos, existence, universe, and so on).
Due to the fact that no objective boundary has been discovered, combined with the fact that physics only provides evidence of a reality of pure energy — which explains why no objective boundary exists, but instead leaves us only with seamless currents of energy — one can objectively state that you are reality.
To avoid a god complex, so too is anyone or anything else.
Accountability is subjective, and that is where the credit for RWT permanently remains.
As time is a spatial dimension within reality, RWT leaves us with a deterministic system of existence, which discomforts anyone who believes that responsibility and determinism are incompatible.
Responsibility is about doing good, of course, and good is about opposing suffering. Determinism does not defy that truth. As suffering still exists within this deterministic system of reality, so too does the need to apply responsible effort towards responsible success. If you do not believe that, then simply stop applying responsible effort, and inevitably experience the resulting unbearably agonizing sensation.
Reality’s need for flawless balance means that no dominant pressure can be permanently asynchronously applied within reality — i.e. there can be no exercise of power without equal powerlessness, so no permanent benefit. In other words, any advantage must ultimately be balanced out via an equal disadvantage.
Reality is zero sum, so there is no way to win the “game” of reality itself (the wisdom of competition clearly has a limit). Because reality is actuality, and actuality is obviously whatever happens, reality is literally all-powerful. However, reality’s power is limited by its own need for its flawless stability.
Reality is in effect literally paying perfect attention to every pressure, because reality has to balance out that pressure.
That includes the pressures of your (in)actions and thoughts.
Reality is a logical form of unstoppably supreme governance, scientifically speaking — not merely philosophically or religiously speaking, which allows disbelievers to simply reject that style of speaking — so thankfully ends the sadly popular idea that one can ever get away with abusive behavior (lying, theft, assault, murder, greed, etc.)
Reality permanently supremely being the “top dog” that effectively holds everyone accountable within reality also ends the tragically popular idea that successful living is always about securing more power, because that power must be fully paid for via an equal measure of powerlessness.
Moreover, due to the wonderful simplicity of that supreme reality balance, even young kids can understand it, so they can learn very early on in life to avoid trying to get away with abusive behavior, and cultivate that avoidance throughout their entire lives.
The scientifically affirmed supreme balance of reality dramatically redefines human behavior against abuse, and redefines power in a way that leaves us with the need to always spend dominance wisely to the fullest possible extent.
The end never justifies the means, because the means (reality) is the only actual end.
The scientific method is about solving problems in a way that upholds rationality.
Understanding RWT does not negate problems, because problems are subjectively a physical part of the reality sine wave, so in addition to the need for responsibility, the need for science continues in this key regard.
Subjectivity includes recklessly stupid opinions, and does not allow for technology, so is insufficient on its own.
Objectivity is any result that remains true regardless of perspective.
The absence of objective boundaries leaves the scientific community immersed within an extreme existential crisis, because science has been entirely about improving our human understanding of the objective truths.
As basically already aforementioned, it is fittingly worth repeating for emphasis that a third class of observation (actually a subclass of subjectivity), one that purely meets the rigor demanded by the scientific method, is needed to end that crisis. Human subjectivity (i.e. hubjectivity) is any result that can only be purely rationally agreeable by humanity, but is not necessarily true outside of that species-level perspective.
Science has actually been hubjective due to the boundaries drawn within science — i.e. scientific conclusions almost exclusively tell us what reality is doing relative to humanity.
What is reality?
Reality is an undefinable extreme.
Why is reality?
Because cause and effect only exist relatively within reality, there is no causing of reality (one cannot logically exist outside of existence to cause existence).
Reality’s sole purpose in effect is its own stability.
Reason in this case only allows us to adjust our perspective towards the undefinable extremeness of reality (e.g. adjust via RWT).
So the nature of the question why in this case prohibits that question from ever making sense.
When is reality?
Reality is the present.
Where is reality?
Reality is everywhere (synonymous with nowhere in this supreme case).
How does reality exist?
Any answer to the question “How?” requires a process, which requires the passage of time. As time is a spatial dimension within reality, that question cannot make sense.
With no intention or reason to be negative about it, human understanding is always relatively crude. Similar to how perception itself has evolved, as we evolve (technologically and otherwise), we refine our perception and understanding by revealing more of the logically dominating details of the human vicinity, and the results that are seamlessly relative to that vicinity.
Spatial dimensionality is a prime example here. Humanity (at least reasonably) understands the dominating three spatial dimensions within human observation (at least during this authoring), and then discovered time as a relatively special dimension.
Science is not about jumping to the discovery of all possible dimensions, but expanding the scope of human (inclusively technological) perception to logically reveal more dimensionality that is pertinent towards improving human leverage — i.e. more complexly understanding the shape of dimensionality relative to other modulating aspects of the human experience.
Reality is purely sinusoidal, so science (actually basically physics) is logically going to transition into fundamentally becoming all about sinusoidal shaping.
While scientists continue their boldly reductionist approach (e.g. smashing particles together to learn from the resulting breakage), it may be possible for scientists to apply a constructive approach as well. As already basically aforementioned, that involves a technique well-established in audio synthesis called additive synthesis, which is simply the combining of sine waves to produce more complex waveforms.
Computer technology is apparently incapable (at least during this authoring) of having additive synthesis applied to a degree that sufficiently produces the relevant parts of the scientifically popular double-slit experiment as a simulated complex energy waveform. Availability of such technology allows scientists to observe (without impacting) the result of that experiment due to the pure sinusoidal nature revealing both the actuality of the unobserved and observed particle.
Even without additive synthesis, RWT brings common sense to the double-slit experiment.
Wave-particle duality does not actually exist, because there is no objective particle boundary. There is a particle resonance (so a particle is still a wave) that seamlessly resonates with observational energy, and that perfectly fits with humanity’s normal scale of experience. If you observe something (e.g. these words), that focus resonates the target of your observation — i.e. resonates all of the particles forming that target.
Moreover, measurement is also a physical energy that collapses the wave function (i.e. resonates the particle), as demonstrated within the double-slit experiment. There is obviously a relationship between the energy of measurement and observation worthy of further exploration.
With respect to uncertainty, prediction accuracy will always be limited by Chaos theory (e.g. as demonstrated during weather forecasting), but that accuracy can always be improved upon by improving the logical reach against that limit — i.e. progressively refined subjectivity amplification to the fullest extent allowable by reality.
While RWT is a bottom-up approach that explains the purely sinusoidal and stable nature of reality as the anchor certainty, String theory is a humanity-down approach that also leaves particles as sinusoidal modulations of energy. RWT deviates from String theory by the logical conclusion that dimensionality (and any other relevance) cannot be objectively rigid/linear (i.e. cannot be purely smooth — in number of dimensions, or any other relevancy).
RWT validates Dr. Albert Einstein’s instincts against quantum physics, without disproving the experimentally validated aspect of that area of physics. A purely sinusoidal reality is simple and elegant.
This document (more specifically a literary sculpture) went through many refinement waves (including those with some glaring and frankly embarrassing errors). Combining those refinements roughly reveals how information is energy, and how better understanding is an increasingly harmonious resonance, relatively speaking. That is similar to the formation of this solar system, which resonated harmoniously inclusively into the planetary system that allows countless waves of life to exist.
Upon considering that information modulates in all possible ways, the overwhelming enormity of possibility and the seriously flexible nature of information itself resonates to whatever resulting (and likely currently unimaginable) accomplishments.
Science is energy.
Never take any boundary too seriously.
“Some subjects are so serious that one can only joke about them.” – Dr. Niels Bohr (Nobel Prize winning physicist)
With that Bohrian wisdom in mind, this author (i.e. this entertainer and science enthusiast) humbly challenges anyone/anything to try to genuinely scientifically debunk RWT.
One apparent way to achieve that debunking is to provide just one other possibility that equally logically fits all genuine scientific conclusions, and actually says something significantly different from RWT.
The other is simply proving the existence of a logical error within RWT, if such an error exists.
Though proponents of this theory may be forced to flee towards the metaphorical hills of artistic license, RWT at worst is a pathetic attempt by an entertainer to unintentionally basically glorify a trigonometry function, while the sine wave continues to demonstrate itself invaluably throughout understanding and mystery.
The comments section has been disabled here, but much-appreciated likes and shares have not been, so please feel free to help positivity in this key regard. However, during each March 14th (i.e. Pi Day, and Dr. Albert Einstein’s birthday) and while able, yours truly will post a reminder resonance of the existence of RWT (an informational pulse), and I welcome any purely scientific comments therein.
Thank you sincerely for your attention here.
Spirit Wave Journal 