What if I told you that the scientific community has already discovered the theory of everything, but they have yet to realize it, because they are understandably not looking at their evidence from the right angle?
At least common sense suggests that your skepticism would be equally understandably peaked.
But the beauty of the scientific method is logical conclusions cannot be righteously denied, even if the source is unconventional (e.g. yours truly).
It all starts with the fact that no objective distinction has ever been discovered.
Quantum physics concludes that particles are blurry, so no hard distinction between them.
Physics tells us that reality is purely energetic. Einstein’s most famous equation basically concludes that mass is highly condensed energy, so all observed physicality is energy.
Reality being purely energetic sensibly reveals why there is no objective distinction (i.e. energy currents obviously have no such distinction).
By removing objective particulate distinction in a purely energetic reality, the apparently still-popular particle/wave duality cannot make sense.
When particles are understood to be relative energetic resonances — so still waves (no duality) — in a purely energetic reality, the scientifically famous double-slit experiment thankfully finally makes perfect sense.
By that logic, the physicality of observation (however it is defined) is energy, and based upon the double-slit experiment, observational energy resonates particles.
In other words, the absence of observation leaves particles flowing as currents of energy through the double slits to form an interference pattern (like water flowing through those two slits). But observation of any sufficient kind resonates with those particles, so they behave as expected even at our common scale of existence.
When you observe your hand or any other area of reality, that observation resonates those particles to behave in a manner that meets your sensible expectations.
As of this authoring, scientists are not treating observation as energy, and they are not adequately firmly embracing and exploring the fact that no objective distinction exists, so their distinction-laced results are somewhat confusing them.
We cannot righteously blame those scientists, because distinction is (inclusively scientific) leverage.
In other words, without distinction, there is simply the oneness of reality, and scientists can do nothing with that result (other than meditate upon it).
Therefore distinctions are scientifically leveraged, which is fine — as long as scientists understand that those distinctions are subjective and inevitably deviate from reality.
A purely energetic reality is a purely sinusoidal reality, as demonstrated by the well-established Fourier theorem (i.e. any complex waveform can be broken down purely into a seamless set of sinusoidal currents).
A purely sinusoidal reality is a purely logical reality, so the unfortunately excessively popular idea that reality’s overwhelming complexity within itself is a sound basis to (inclusively passionately, if not violently) uphold irrational conclusions is now sensibly voided completely into the realm of mental problems worthy of deep societal concern.
The scientific evidence only shows that the sine wave is the sole pattern of reality, and when scientists finally realize that conclusion, science will be firmly advanced by being ultimately about sinusoidal shaping — an area where theorists dealing with M Theory (and so on) are already unwittingly operating.
To instantly appreciate the unimaginable challenge that scientists face in sinusoidal shaping, simply observe your situation. Obviously the amount and style of particle resonances within your vicinity is overwhelming upon sufficient scrutiny. Countless particles are there forming highly complicated outcomes (including your perception), so you begin to understand that sinusoidal shaping of the human vicinity is terribly challenging work that will keep scientists busy throughout posterity.
The absence of relativity at the scale of the oneness of reality due to the absence of objective distinctions means that reality has no shape.
Shape is a form of definition, and any definition also requires relativity, so reality has no definition.
Reality can only be currently scientifically concluded to be an undefinable extreme.
The absence of relativity is one way towards understanding that reality is an undefinable extreme, but there is another way similarly relying solely upon mainstream scientific logic to reinforce that critical conclusion.
Balance is inherent within stability.
No known system is unbalanced yet stable, and science in effect refuses to even suggest the possibility of unbalanced stability.
That includes reality itself as logically the ultimate system.
As balance is required for reality’s stability, balancing energetic possibilities inevitably includes phase inversion that results in phase cancellation (a.k.a. destructive interference).
Note that phase cancellation makes sense instead of destructive interference (the latter being the physics term), because the result of that supreme “destruction” is reality.
Some clarification may help here.
Reality equals all possibilities.
A stable reality equals the balance of all possibilities.
The balance of all energetic possibilities inevitably includes phase inversion (i.e. what goes up in waveforms instead goes down and vice versa), which ultimately leaves us with the supreme version of phase cancellation, so reality is an undefinable extreme.
Time has been repeatedly experimentally proven to be a dimension of space, so while humanity perceives the passage of time, science reveals that time is actually one spatial moment (this one).
Experience itself concludes that reality cannot terminate, because if reality terminates in a future place, then we could not be experiencing reality, as time is spatial.
So reality’s stability is permanent in the only actual moment, and is the logical supremacy — a critical base for understanding.
Any area within reality that challenges that stability is subjectively doomed, which is why we die (and so on).
However, critically note that as reality is one without distinction, the objective “you” is synonymous with reality.
Progress is always subjective, because there is no way to progress reality’s stability.
Everything within reality is governed by that stability.
Math cannot be the base of the theory of everything (i.e. there is no equation that generates reality), because math requires distinctions, which inevitably conflicts with reality’s undefinable extremeness.
Another way to look at the limits of mathematical reach is a sinusoidal reality means no objective linearity. Any rigidity (so a linear construct) is merely subjective (i.e. a very lengthy sinusoidal current that merely appears straight). As math is inherently rigid, inevitably that rigidity becomes problematic against reality’s pure sinusoidal curvature.
However, math can be refined to reveal more complexity of sinusoidal shaping within the human vicinity, which naturally leads to better technology and so on.
Space can only be scientifically concluded to be energy.
It would not surprise me, if someone extended Einstein’s most famous equation basically from ‘energy = mass’ to ‘energy = mass = space’.
As space is energy, the properties of space modulate in all possible ways.
As of this authoring, there are three familiar spatial dimensions, the fourth dimension that is time, and the mathematical necessity for more dimensions to make the well-established equations of relativity and quantum physics fit together.
When we understand that dimensionality is energy without distinction, we understand that dimensionality is basically oceanic (e.g. way more dimensional currents than humanity has so far acknowledged) and blends with mass.
As an audio sculptor, I often demonstrate spatial energy. Everything that comes out of your speakers is energy, and that includes the results from reverberation and other spatial effects commonly used throughout the recording industry to create a musically likeable sense of space in the resulting audio mix.
Next time you need to blow your nose (or such), first crumple the tissue and observe the relatively complex shape. There is no scientific reason to believe that dimensionality (including the number of them) is incapable of at least that complexity.
The three dominant spatial dimensions are dominant spatial energy currents (ultimately curved, despite their linear presentation to the contrary), while time is a lesser dominant current, which is hypothetically why the brain evolved differently with respect to time.
Revealing more spatial complexity in the human vicinity is a major area of scientific and technological advancement — one that may have humanity modulating to the farthest reaches of existence (or such).
That part of this post forms a reasonable summary, but there is significantly more detail in my fairly brief document titled “Reality Waveform Theory” (freely accessible at rwave.life — which simply redirects to a page conveniently available at this journal).
Reality Waveform Theory answers the basic questions of reality itself in a purely logical way that literally fits all experimentally confirmed science.
In other words, the basics (i.e. the what, why, where, when, and how) of reality itself are truly basic, even despite the unimaginably overwhelming complexity within reality.
Humanity now has access to those basics for an unprecedented grounding to strengthen our stability as a species and individually within our species.
Reality Waveform Theory even validates Einstein’s instincts against quantum physics — without sacrificing the experimentally verified aspect of quantum physics.
The theory is relatively brief, although the logic is perhaps challenging to understand in places at least partly due to the need to strictly adhere to solely leveraging certainty within the English language.
To encourage proper scientific scrutiny of the aforementioned conclusions and Reality Waveform Theory overall, this post will repeat annually on March 14 — Pi Day (which also happens to be Dr. Albert Einstein’s birthday) — with refinement or retraction, if scientifically appropriate.
The ramifications of Reality Waveform Theory are powerfully serious with respect to humanity. We will not explore them in depth within this post, but optionally reserve them for reverberating posts decorating this annual pulse.
In short, Reality Waveform Theory at least allows us to understand the ultimate absence of multiple egos (we are all energetically one with a literally interminable reality), the consequent logical removal of the fear of death due to reality’s permanent stability and the aforementioned oneness, the understanding that control and freewill (however defined) are energy, and the understanding that nobody can intelligently believe in the possibility of getting away with corruption due to reality’s balancing need for stability (dominance is always spent and fully paid for by being dominated, as dominance is energy) — apparently leading to a dramatically positive change in human behavior (e.g. logically discouraging greed and other unhealthy power grabs).
While I disabled comments in Reality Waveform Theory, your mutually constructive comments regarding that theory and/or this post are welcome here, as is sharing this post to preferably join the righteous quest to logically improve posterity.