You do not need to watch that video to understand this post.
What mainly matters is the absence of understanding the fundamental truth as revealed scientifically ironically unbeknownst to any scientist I have ever encountered…
Reality is energy.
What that video expresses instead is a sampling of the mathematical frames that humanity has discovered showing us how energy relatively modulates.
What scientists refuse to acknowledge is the literally critical fact that no objective distinction has ever been discovered.
Quantum physics in effect declares that particles are blurry, so there is no objective distinction between particle A and particle B.
Mass is energy, as basically proven by Einstein’s most famous equation, so the absence of any objective distinction means that scientists can only scientifically conclude that reality is energy — yet they refuse to do so (at least for all intents and purposes).
Why?
Because they are understandably addicted to distinction (as is basically everyone else — perhaps including you).
Without distinction, there can only be the boundless oneness of reality (perfect for meditation fans, but not so much for scientific ones).
Distinctions enable (inclusively scientific) leverage, so enables the practice of science within reality.
However, distinctions only exist subjectively, and this is wreaking havoc upon the scientific community and humanity at large.
I have so much more to say about this issue, but audience interest tragically never surfaces here, and my resources are unfortunately limited due to my healthily busy status.
A purely energetic reality is a purely sinusoidal reality, according to Fourier theorem, so a purely logical reality — despite the fact that energetic modulations are complex unimaginably well-beyond humanity’s grasp.
I will add philosophy to my tags, because I believe there could be more interest within that community to express this actually purely scientific conclusion that answers the basic questions of reality itself in a purely logical way that literally fits all well-established scientific conclusions.
In short, it sounds like philosophy, but is actually hard science.
Given the critical nature of this issue, I will continue trying my best to connect with proper interest for community traction.
I hope you will join us.
Leave a Reply