Logical Supremacy

Reality’s stability is ultimately the sole purpose.

How can I be so certain? Let’s examine the grounded and unspun logic.

First, to ensure no terminology confusion, by reality, I mean the totality of existence (not just a part of it).

Time is a dimension of space, experimentally scientifically speaking.

If I travel from point A to point B in familiar three-dimensional space, while I am traveling between those points, they exist simultaneously. If those points are major cities (or anywhere relevantly else), then I can witness news and social media posting at both of those locations during my travels to confirm that simultaneous existence.

We have no scientific reason to believe that time is any different.

Basically point A is the past, point B is the future, and where I am between those points is the present.

All time is one spatial moment — this one.

Therefore, we can conclusively state that reality cannot die at any future place, because if reality dies in the future, then reality dies in the present (as time is spatial).

Remember that all time exists within reality, so reality is not governed by time (quite the contrary).

In other words, there would be no latency upon reality’s future demise. If the sun disappeared, it would take eight minutes for us to realize that critical loss, because the sun’s light takes that amount of time to travel the 93,000,000 miles to get here. If reality disappeared in the future, however, it would instantly disappear now — as the spatial moment itself would equally disappear.

Experience itself effectively concludes that reality cannot die, which means reality’s stability is the logical supremacy.

One can deify that stability, if desired, but there is no sensible reason for that deification, as we will explore in later posting.

We will also go into more depth regarding exactly what reality’s stability is.

We will also understand the genuinely profound significance of that truth as it pertains to practical living.

This is the real deal, as confirmed via grounded and unspun logic itself. Feel free to challenge it, but only grounded and unspun logic will prompt a response from yours truly.

“Sole Substance of Reality” is the next post coming next Saturday morning — and yes, I am talking about the sole pattern of reality that is being strongly sought after by scientists right now in their efforts towards the theory of everything.

Those scientists have already made the discovery, but they do not realize it yet.

That’s not because they’re stupid (they’re not). It’s because the very nature of what they scientifically do defies that realization.

Peace out (and in).

I am an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an artist working and resting to best carefully contribute towards helping society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest -- all within a sometimes offbeat style of psychedelic artistry.

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Keep It Real

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

my pEarthly and earthly self blended together via the energy of the reality "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

Follow Spirit Wave Journal on WordPress.com
Thank You
Thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer

Spirit Wave (“entertainer” herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content (“entertainment” herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use.

%d bloggers like this: