Terrible Position

From “Trooper’s widow urges no vote on legalizing Massachusetts marijuana”:

The widow of a state trooper killed by a driver who allegedly smoked marijuana before the crash is making an emotional plea against a ballot question that would legalize Massachusetts marijuana for recreational use.

There is literally no concrete (so credible) evidence that proves prohibition works at all. We do not even have a “drug free” prison system.

Every instance of drug abuse related tragedy in effect condemns prohibition as a failed (and flagrantly rights-infringing) approach, so even if the driver abused cannabis by driving impaired, that is equally a reason to end prohibition (not sustain it).

Prohibition is ineffective, destructive, blatantly unlawful at all levels of government in an uncorrupted American judicial system (spare us the Commerce Clause against the surreptitiously illegally disarmed Ninth Amendment combined with the Supremacy Clause), and at least in the case of cannabis (statistically reported by our government to be about 75% of “illicit” drug use — so largely forms the war on [some politicized] drugs) — scientifically unwarranted.

There is no experimental science concluding any harm in moderate cannabis use.

There is “suggestive” science (that critically leaves out intake method differential, precise intake amount, and strain differential — so actually junk science) that still only goes as far as to state that “heavy use” and abuse may/can cause harm (while disclaiming more research is needed to solidify those results) — results unethically turned into tough-talking affirmations to condone sanctioned thuggery for generations.

There is demonstrable evidence that proves that prohibition has ruined millions (if not billions) of non-rights-infringing (so innocent) lives for several decades and still strongly counting, while the mainstream media still largely refuses to publicly challenge the legitimacy of prohibition in this case (a challenge that would likely greatly raise public pressure to end the monstrous scam).

What about those fathers (and everyone else) among those millions (if not billions) of innocent lives?

The real drug epidemic is ironically drug prohibition addiction — i.e. “community leaders” publicly destructively lying and in effect stealing to outrageously hypocritically get their prohibition fix.

I am sincerely sorry for Mrs. Clardy’s loss, but her consequent positioning is nothing shy of terrible — based upon the whole truth and nothing but.

I am an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an artist working and resting to best carefully contribute towards helping society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest -- all within a sometimes offbeat style of psychedelic artistry.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Respect Cannabis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

my pEarthly and earthly self blended together via the energy of the reality "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

Follow Spirit Wave Journal on WordPress.com
Thank You
Thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer

Spirit Wave (“entertainer” herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content (“entertainment” herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use.

%d bloggers like this: