Prompted by “Why String Theory Is Not Science”: http://science.slashdot.org/story/15/12/25/1451210/why-string-theory-is-not-science
Earlier this month, a conference was held devoted to the question of whether untestable scientific ideas like string theory and the multiverse are actually science or not. While many opinions were stated and no one changed their mind, the answer is apparent: unless you’re willing to change the definition of science to include “this thing that isn’t science,” then no, string theory is not science. It’s a theory in the sense of a mathematical theory — like set theory, group theory or number theory — but it isn’t yet a scientific theory. Of course, it could become science, but that would require that it actually do the things a scientific theory does: make testable predictions that can be validated or falsified.
In a purely energetic reality, mathematics is inherently complex beyond the ability to leverage that scientifically popular language area to describe the sole pattern of literally all existence.
Enter this entertainer and science enthusiast (a stickler for flawless application of the scientific method).
Stepping outside of math to rely upon another form of certainty — fully logically worded constructs — a new ‘theory of everything’ has existed for over a year now unbeknownst to the scientific community (because — being a very busy man — I have yet to reach out there strongly enough).
Reality Waveform Theory (RWT) was meticulously authored and refined to concisely express one fully logical and grounded conclusion without any possible alternative — the sine wave (the sole ingredient of any waveform) is the sole pattern of literally all existence.
Because of a purely sinusoidal nature, RWT makes testable predictions that can be validated or falsified, and fundamentally meets string theory from the certain ground up.
I continue to (usually monthly) refine the document expressing RWT as a better read, but the logic there is complete.
String theorists should logically become Reality Waveform theorists — especially since additive synthesis (the combination of sine waves to form complex waveforms) apparently provides light at the end of the unscientific string theory tunnel.
At the very least, scientists (in determining their future exploration) should be leveraging the fact that no objective distinction has ever been proven to exist.
A particle has been scientifically described by Dr. Edward Witten (brilliant founder of M theory) to be a “blur”.
Distinction (being purely subjective) is ironically necessary in working with the scientific method, but transitioning into a purely energetic mindset keeps those distinctions understood as subjective (e.g. objectively purely energetic formations within the human brain to form that subjectivity) without destroying that key method of objective leverage.
A logically key breakthrough of that conclusion on behalf of string theorists and other scientists is space has been unproven to be objectively distinct from its occupants — so space modulates seamlessly energetically.
That means dimensionality (and any other spatial property) modulates in all possible ways, which logically crushes the overly simplistic rigidity of dimensionality at 11 dimensions (or such) necessary to fit within the mathematical frames of relativity and quantum physics.
Two important facts reinforcing RWT:
- No well-established science conflicts with RWT.
- Validation of Dr. Albert Einstein’s instincts against quantum physics — without disproving quantum physics — results from RWT.
It’s fine time for RWT to be put to the best scientific test, so please help yours truly spread the scientific word throughout the scientific community.
If it helps, the following sincerity comes from the overall conclusion section of RWT…
As this theory is primarily the result of hard-working scientists throughout history, RWT is dedicated to the honorable science community as a fitting thank you.