Prompted by “Physicists Theorize Out How To Retrieve Information From a Black Hole”: http://science.slashdot.org/story/15/12/23/237202/physicists-theorize-out-how-to-retrieve-information-from-a-black-hole
Black holes earn their name because their gravity is so strong not even light can escape from them. Oddly, though, physicists have come up with a bit of theoretical sleight of hand to retrieve a speck of information that’s been dropped into a black hole. The calculation touches on one of the biggest mysteries in physics: how all of the information trapped in a black hole leaks out as the black hole ‘evaporates.’ Many theorists think that must happen, but they don’t know how.
When I experience (read, watch) the results from the scientific community, forcing mysteries towards resolution with their seriously rigid definition of space is like watching someone struggling to wear a shoe that’s too small (with all due and well-earned respect to that community).
Considering there has never been even the tiniest shred of science concluding any objective distinction (Dr. Edward Witten, founder of M Theory, best described a particle as a “blur”), there also is no science concluding space is actually distinct from the energy within it.
When we examine the massive mystery that’s unperceived phenomena — e.g. dark matter, dark energy, quantum entanglement, virtual particles, gravitons, black hole information, etc. — we understand that reality enormously extends well beyond human (including technological) perception.
The only sensible conclusion is space (obviously including any of its properties — e.g. dimensionality) is purely energetic without actual distinction.
That means the shape of a black hole can modulate well beyond human perception (literally think oceanic dimensionality), and the information falling into a black hole simply modulates beyond the “singularity” (which is logically the edge of a rigid mathematical frame) along hidden dimensionality.
Importantly note that energy never settles and there’s no actual linearity, so mathematical rigidity will always have an edge of reason. For example, you could look at the following hyphen — “-” — and think it’s actually linear. If you could zoom way in upon that straightness, however, you would eventually reach a zoom depth revealing only curvature (linearity is purely subjective).
All of that eventually ties in with Reality Waveform Theory (RWT), which I healthily confidently maintain is the actual “theory of everything” the scientific community is still searching for. It’s part of my journal and conveniently freely available for anyone to read, contemplate, and preferably share.
From humanity’s core understanding, science radiates understanding itself outwards in all possible directions. Because of the purely energetic nature of reality, there’s also the purely sinusoidal nature of reality (Fourier analysis).
…one more strange property of quantum mechanics: that measurement not only reveals something about a system, it also changes its state.
There’s nothing strange about it, when you logically consider that observation (including measurement) itself is purely energetic, so has a physical and seamless impact upon the observed system.
Without any distinction, it’s critical for everyone to understand that information is also purely energetic, so you and your thoughts (intentions, focuses, efforts, avoidance, prayers, etc.) are purely energetic.
Considering RWT literally fits with all well-established scientific discoveries, the theory is perfectly logically strong.
RWT even validates the brilliant Dr. Albert Einstein’s instincts against quantum physics — without disproving quantum physics.
The wording of RWT can be challenging to read, because I meticulously refined it to fully logically say only one thing (as the scientific method clearly demands).
Instead of directly using mathematical language, I use only certainties to form the worded construct.
The English language has many words with multiple definitions potentially producing uncertainty — a violation of strictest science — so extreme care was needed to avoid that violation, which means the language can be fully understandable, but not always orthodox.
Leave a Reply