Psym 19

19

There’s pressure towards chaos in psym culture, but not without a complex responsibility signature resonating protectively.

Psym 19 is published here, because it simply feels right to jump around.

The depicted being modulates well outside of human familiarity. Due to serious limitations, that depiction is roughly as accurate as the common child’s drawing magnetically stuck to a refrigerator.

In the seamless and boundless ocean of energy that reality forms from humanity’s view (mainstream physics speaking), the possibilities forming the relative shaping of consciousness spiral infinitely beyond the imaginable.

Dimensionality is energetic (based at least upon the absence of any science confirming the existence of a single objective distinction), so modulates in all possible ways. That raises an eyebrow to the popular notion of reality being limited to the four dimensions of space (three familiar ones plus time).

There are theories expanding the number of dimensions at least for mathematically defined stability (e.g. 11 in M Theory), but those expansions also remain questionable at least due to the scientific competition to conclude dimensional certainty.

It’s no secret that the human brain (as wonderful as it relatively is) remains seriously limited in its conscious reach (what you see is most certainly not all there is by a long-shot). On the one hand, our species has achieved relative brilliance, while on the other hand, we’re relatively not much smarter than the least intelligent species we’ve encountered.

The depicted being places us in the latter hand (an understatement) with no disrespect intended.

That being can modulate through uncountable dimensions, so is relatively enormously powerful by our standards.

Still, reality’s need is the ultimate dominance (with a 100% success rate with literally no possibility of alteration). Time is spatial, so (headache warning: don’t try to grasp) the future through past is this moment, which means reality’s obvious presence permanently defies its future demise.

That being is subjectively defined, so we’re all a physical part of that being (consciousness is subjective) that we energetically “see” through to the undefinable extreme that’s existence itself — where relativity (so definition, shape, size, and all other relative qualities) cannot possibly exist.

Another way of looking at Psym 19 is it’s just psy candy for your positivity.

Highly recommended is viewing the image at its maximum resolution.

I am an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an artist working and resting to best carefully contribute towards helping society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest -- all within a sometimes offbeat style of psychedelic artistry.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Entertain You?, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Welcome
my pEarthly and earthly self blended together via the energy of the reality "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

Branches
Follow Spirit Wave Journal on WordPress.com
Community
Thank You
Thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer

Spirit Wave (“entertainer” herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content (“entertainment” herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use.

%d bloggers like this: