Up in Vape

Prompted by “Study: Smoking Still Remains Cannabis Consumers’ Preferred Method of Ingestion”: http://www.thedailychronic.net/2015/46547/study-smoking-still-remains-cannabis-consumers-preferred-method-of-ingestion/

Anyone should obviously be able to enjoy their preferred cannabis intake method, but I still prefer to promote the lawful use of cannabis by vaporization.

Use of vaporization technology, which does not result in the exposure to combustion gases…

Besides the strong improvement towards health impact, vaporization is relatively highly efficient, so the amount of material needed for consumption is much less than the material amount needed for other methods — which means saving a lot of money (probably the kicker for many users).

My mom, a licensed medical cannabis user in our state, initially had a quarter ounce each of two strains (she hasn’t been a user for more than a year yet) — two daytime puffs of one strain and two nighttime puffs of the other. That amount of cannabis availability is well on track to span roughly a year, despite four puffs of mild vaporization daily.

Her intake amount is likely less than many smokers, because she’s a new user and has modest medical cannabis intake amount needs, but any smoker out there probably can see the dramatic expense difference even for heavier vapor intake.

Electronic vaporization with temperature control is awesome, because of the basically flawless consistency and precision of intake. That’s excellent (if not needed for a responsible introduction to safe cannabis intake) for beginners and may even remain the preference by many advanced users.

Vaporization is (at least basically) odorless, so (at least likely) unoffensive to surrounding folks disliking the pungent quality of this plant.

While no cannabis hangover competes with the terrible harshness from excessive alcohol consumption, vaporization leaves the user feeling no hangover upon effects wearing off (a user could even go workout at the gym then). Smoking is apparently more taxing on the body than vaporization, so requires more bodily energy for recovery, which means less motivation after smoking. That hypothesis may be based upon personal experience a longtime ago (or not) — intentionally vague to raise awareness of the serious problem against allowing first amendment support necessary for promptly ending a morally bankrupt (and obviously unconstitutional) prohibition.

There’s no doubt in my mind that vaporization will eventually overtake the other intake methods, especially since technological efforts to improve vaporization to bring the “whole plant” experience continue during the rapid evolution of this wonderful and powerful plant.

I am an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an artist working and resting to best carefully contribute towards helping society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest -- all within a sometimes offbeat style of psychedelic artistry.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Respect Cannabis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

my pEarthly and earthly self blended together via the energy of the reality "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

Follow Spirit Wave Journal on WordPress.com
Thank You
Thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer

Spirit Wave (“entertainer” herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content (“entertainment” herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use.

%d bloggers like this: